Chris Froome: Team Sky rider says legacy will not be tainted by ‘adverse’ drugs test


‘I certainly haven’t broken any rules’

Four-time Tour de France winner Chris Froome says his legacy will not be tainted after returning an “adverse” drugs test at the Vuelta a Espana.

The Team Sky rider, 32, had double the allowed level of legal asthma drug Salbutamol in his urine.

In an interview with the BBC in Mallorca, Froome said he “knows the rules” and there was “no wrongdoing”.

“I understand this comes as a big shock to people,” he said. “I certainly haven’t broken any rules here.”

Cycling’s world governing body the UCI wants more details from the team but says Froome is not suspended.

The use of Salbutamol is permitted, without the need of a therapeutic use exemption (TUE), but only within certain doses.

Froome says he increased his dosage but it was within the legal limits, adding that he was “only too happy” to help the UCI “fill in the blanks”.

Asked whether he felt his legacy was permanently tainted, Froome said: “No.”

He added: “I can understand a lot of people’s reactions, especially given the history of the sport. This is not a positive test.

“The sport is coming from a very dark background and I have tried to do everything through my career to show that the sport has turned around.”

‘I have done this for 10 years now’

Froome says he took his team doctor’s advice to up his inhaler use after his asthma symptoms got worse during the Vuelta.

He became the first Briton to win the three-week race around Spain and it followed his Tour de France victory in July.

He was notified of the “adverse analytical finding” on 20 September 2017.

The urine test, taken on 7 September, showed levels of the drug, Salbutamol, which is commonly taken for asthma, were at 2,000 nanograms per millilitre (ng/ml).

That compares to the World Anti-Doping Agency’s (Wada) threshold of 1,000 ng/ml.

“I have been a professional cyclist now, treating my symptoms and racing with asthma, for 10 years,” said Froome.

“I know what those rules are, I know what those limits are and I have never been over those limits.

“I have got a very clear routine when I use my inhaler and how many times. I have given all that information to the UCI to help get to the bottom of it.”

Chris Froome became the first British winner of the Vuelta a Espana this year

‘I need to disguise my weaknesses’

Froome was named in leaked medical records by the Russian hackers Fancy Bears as one of the athletes to use TUEs during competition.

The documents claimed he was given the exemption for the asthma drug prednisolone in May 2013 and April 2014.

Earlier this year, the rider admitted he rejected a TUE for his asthma during his Tour de France win in 2015.

Froome said journalists could see he was struggling after stages during the Vuelta, but told them he was fine in order to “disguise any kind of weaknesses from his rivals”.

“I am racing against guys who are looking for any kind of weakness,” he added.

“I am not going to admit through a Grand Tour that ‘yes. I am suffering with something’, because the next day my rivals will come out absolutely swinging.”

An uncertain future for Froome – analysis

Dan Roan, BBC sports editor

Chris Froome’s damage-limitation exercise has begun. But the greatest road cyclist in the world still faces a major fight for his reputation.

Froome’s recent domination of road cycling has meant he has repeatedly been forced to insist he is clean. He has also been a vocal critic of the abuse of TUEs, something that could now leave him open to suggestions of hypocrisy.

Some will ask why he told reporters he felt “fine” after the 18th stage of the Vuelta, at a time when his team now says his dosage was increased due to “acute asthma symptoms”. But others will remain confident he can satisfactorily explain the elevated levels of Salbutamol, and continue a career that has earned him a £4m-a-year contract.

Certainly, there will be a huge amount at stake when the UCI rules on this case in several months’ time.

This is also another blow to Team Sky. A UK Anti-Doping investigation into a mystery delivery to former rider Sir Bradley Wiggins and a lack of medical records was damaging enough, but this could be much, much worse.

Like his team, Froome was meant to symbolise a new era for the sport after cycling was brought to its knees by a deeply troubled doping past. But this has left both the rider and his team facing an uncertain future, and ensured the suspicion that lingers around British cycling continues.

More controversy around Team Sky

Last week former UCI chief Brian Cookson said Team Sky should have its reputation “reinstated” following unproven doping allegations and questions over its use of TUEs.

“I don’t think anyone should be surprised when a professional sports team pushes the rules right to the very limit,” Cookson said.

In November, UK Anti-Doping completed its investigation into allegations of wrongdoing at Team Sky and British Cycling.

The 14-month inquiry was looking into claims a ‘mystery’ medical package delivered for Sir Bradley Wiggins at the Criterium du Dauphine in 2011.

Ukad said it had been “unable” to prove the package contained a banned substance.

Wiggins had sought TUEs to use banned anti-inflammatory drug triamcinoclone for allergies and respiratory issues before the 2011 Tour de France, his 2012 Tour win and the 2013 Giro d’Italia.

Wiggins, British Cycling and Team Sky always denied any wrongdoing.

Previous Salbutamol use in cycling?

The NHS say,